Want to hear some crazy?
Listen in:
So, now that they lack the "activist judges" argument for Vermont, what tack to they take? "THOSE REPRESENTATIVES ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE AREN'T REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PEOPLE."
They just sound crazier and crazier.
And just as a side note, the people in Vermont, according to polls, DO support same-sex marriage. So, sorry. You're just flat wrong about what the people of Vermont "really want". Not every state is a small-minded, but much larger, version of the offices of the "Liberty" [HA] Council.
And then there's the typical lines of crap about "activist judges" "changing the definition of marriage" in Iowa. These people are just impossible to take.
What the hell matters so much about denying me my rights that they spend this much time on it? Why are they so obsessed with it? Why can't they spend their lives actually doing good and helping people in a real and tangible way, instead of in their theoretical/political way?
Audio source: Audio: As our rights become 'marrier', our opposition becomes scarier - Good As You
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
More Good News from Iowa
The Iowa State Senate president stands up for same-sex marriage. A beautiful statement.
(The first part is quoting his daughter, but...well, he still said that on the floor.)
Iowa Senate President Blocks Same-Sex Marriage Ban | Box Turtle Bulletin
“‘You guys don’t understand. You’ve already lost.’ … No, Senator McKinley, I will not co-sponsor a leadership bill with you.”
(The first part is quoting his daughter, but...well, he still said that on the floor.)
Iowa Senate President Blocks Same-Sex Marriage Ban | Box Turtle Bulletin
Dear Governor Douglas,
Why don't you go give up your marriage and enter into one of those "perfectly sufficent" civil unions with your wife?
JACKASS
Sincerely,
Me
V-T- gets its irrational E O - Good As You:: Gay and Lesbian Activism With a Sense of Humor
JACKASS
Sincerely,
Me
V-T- gets its irrational E O - Good As You:: Gay and Lesbian Activism With a Sense of Humor
Monday, April 6, 2009
The religious right and torture memos--What's in it for them?
I was reading an interesting article today on The Daily Beast about some recent political wrangling over Bush era torture memos. Republicans are threatening to filibuster two of Obama's legal apointments (Remember when Republicans were arguing that it was impermissible to filibuster apointments, back when their guy was in office and it was those meanies, the Democrats, who were doing the filibustering? Oh how the times do change!) if Obama releases some of the potentially incriminating memos.
Full article is here: Are Republicans Blackmailing Obama? - The Daily Beast
But besides all that other stuff (which is, sadly, just typical Washington) I saw this little nugget:
Has it finally happened? The Religious Right has not subsumed, but been subsumed by the political machine it sought to control?
Or is this a mutual back-scratching arrangement: "You pester Arlen to protect our political ass, and we will go out and get the 'homos' and 'baby-killers' for you. (Or at least pretend to.)"
UPDATE: Or, perhaps, the third option: the politico right wants these nominations to go down and they've fed the religious right some lines about her being an "abortionist" or a "homosexual activist" or somesuch in order to prompt them to oppose her.
In which case the relationship would be more Pavlov and Dog than subsumption or mutuality.
Full article is here: Are Republicans Blackmailing Obama? - The Daily Beast
But besides all that other stuff (which is, sadly, just typical Washington) I saw this little nugget:
[One of the nominees up for confirmation,] Johnsen has met recently with moderate Republican Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, both of whom are being lobbied heavily by colleagues and religious right groups to oppose her nomination. [Emphasis mine]What stake, exactly, do religious groups have in opposing releasing torture memos? This sounds like a purely political move on the part of any religious group participating in this.
Has it finally happened? The Religious Right has not subsumed, but been subsumed by the political machine it sought to control?
Or is this a mutual back-scratching arrangement: "You pester Arlen to protect our political ass, and we will go out and get the 'homos' and 'baby-killers' for you. (Or at least pretend to.)"
UPDATE: Or, perhaps, the third option: the politico right wants these nominations to go down and they've fed the religious right some lines about her being an "abortionist" or a "homosexual activist" or somesuch in order to prompt them to oppose her.
In which case the relationship would be more Pavlov and Dog than subsumption or mutuality.
Friday, April 3, 2009
IOWA: What the Tweeple on the street say
First off: HORAY FOR IOWA!
And second, here are my collected reactions from the folks I follow on Twitter:


But the award for best reaction goes to one of my favorite guests on Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me, a comedienne appearing tonight in Des Moines, Paula Poundstone:
And second, here are my collected reactions from the folks I follow on Twitter:


But the award for best reaction goes to one of my favorite guests on Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me, a comedienne appearing tonight in Des Moines, Paula Poundstone:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)